The Society for the Diffusion of Knowledge P.O. Box 964, Kaunakakai, HI 96748

    Once a simple wave winds a spiral configuration so tight, that its spiral surfaces are all nearly touching (approaching zero separation) along either an interior shell or an exterior shell, as the case may be;  for any given simple wave of any speed or wave size (l), the wave will eventually become a standing wave, and no longer wrap the field any further.
  To understand this, one must understand the variability of available wave size throughout the entire field.
    From beyond deep space, in excess of billions of light-years, marking our limit of  observation, waves pile in from every direction, and those of more ancient origination, having the larger wave diameters.  And there are smaller ones, generated in the sun in immense numbers, called neutrinos in conventional physics, all of which cause field noise, predominately equivalent 2.73^o Kelvin background radiation.
    All surfaces within the Random Field conduct this field noise, including those surfaces comprising a spiral configuration.  It is this field noise which causes a simple wave orbiting around a spiral configuration to become a standing wave.
    The actual distribution of motion for a simple wave is considered to be bell shaped;  its wave diameter (l) is the distance (measured in s-units) across the wave between points where its distribution of motion declines to zero.  As this wave wraps the field tighter and tighter around a spiral array, it no longer impinges against surfaces ahead of it near the wave center, as it would do in a perfectly parallel field of surfaces, but begins to strike them off to the side.  As the field tightens, this striking point moves closer and closer to the wave's edge, slowly and inexorably slowing down in its forward progress.
    Eventually, as this continues, the wave will encounter surfaces actually moving against it with greater velocities than its own, caused by field noise.  When this happens, interchange with these surfaces will send it back into the direction from which it came.  Of course, field surfaces coming in from behind will send it forward;  the simple wave now caught in the embrace of field noise.
    Unable to move forward or backward, the spiral winding becomes lock;  unable to wind tighter or unwind.

    Once such stability is achieved, the orientation of those surfaces caught as spirals remains constant relative to any ray struck from what is believed to be the best center for the spiral configuration and is dependent to their distance from center where they cross this ray.   Conversely, any lateral impulses direct against the spiral at this crossing point between ray and spiral will have a fixed redirection relative to their direction at this crossing point, at the spiral center.
    Clearly, just as in the case between radial configurations, a lateral interaction between spiral configurations can be expected.  Considerably more complicated than IDDI causing forces between radial configurations, whose radials generally overall can be considered as being straight, at least in the sense that the net effect of IDDI being transmitted along curved and wavy radials is nearly approximated by a system of straight radials, the exact direction of vectors caused by IDDI at various distances from a spiral must be calculated, taking into effect the curvature of the spiral.
    Despite being irregular and wavy, spirals follow a specific and uniform curve, caused by the standing wave of that configuration.  Just as with radials, spirals experience interchange and subsequent IDDI in near proximity to every spiral crossing (intersection), which in turn finds itself transmitted to the spiral center.
    Unlike radials, because of the interlacing curves of two spirals, as well as the spiraling curve meeting the spiral shell, the resultant direction of IDDI at the spiral center, core and shell can be quite different and varied.  Presently the exact spiraling of this curve is unknown and far from being mathematically represented.  The quantitative evaluation of spiral forces has not been done.  Nevertheless, several visual representations of spiral have been evaluated:  revealing telltale signs of both convergent and divergent moments at moderate distances, such that like spirals repel and unlike spirals attract, correlating electrostatic principle that like charges repel and unlike charges attract.
    Depending on the initial direction of the orbiting wave, spirals can be wrapped either clockwise or counterclockwise.  If two clockwise spirals approach each other along a common plane, with their polar axes parallel, repulsive or attractive impulse moments will occur.  These are not forces since the argument of time is absent.
    In the following figure we see an overhead view of just such an approach of two clockwise spirals (the orbiting wave was originally traveling counterclockwise) whose spirals are shown only on the k-plane.  Remember, we are looking at the spiral surfaces on edge where they cut the k-plane, thus they are shown as lines.  Within the shaded area, spirals emanating from both spiral configurations A and B graze without intersecting.  This is the area of greatest interchange between them.  Outside these areas, the spirals hardly interact.

    In section C (to the far left), two spiral surfaces 1 and 2 are shown. Spiral 1 belongs to configuration A and spiral 2 belongs to configuration B.  If IDDI results from interchange between these two spiral surfaces, they will be drawn together.  Facing east along these spirals (towards B), spiral 1 will be drawn downward, and spiral 2 will be drawn upward.  Since IDDI is not relative to any frame of reference, rigid or otherwise, it will find itself redirected relative to the spiral center as the spiral carrying it winds into the shell.  Whether or not the final direction relates to its entry point into the shell or at the spiral center is unknown.  In this evaluation, it is arbitrarily, with some good reason, thought to affect the spiral configuration at its shell, in which case, the direction of its IDDI points somewhere in the direction of east (left).
    All IDDIs emanating from interchanges occurring in area C between the two bold spirals entering this picture from top and bottom, or anywhere between these two bold spirals, will drive configuration A east towards configuration B.  This is why the shaded area where spirals 1 and 2 touch is denoted C, for convergent.
    Between this region and spiral shell A is another smaller region denoted as D (follow the downward bold arrow).  IDDIs originating in here will drive configuration A west, away from B, thus being denoted as D for divergent.  All IDDIs emanating from interchanges occurring in area D between the two bold spirals entering this picture from top and bottom, or anywhere on this side of these two bold spirals, will drive configuration A west away from configuration B.  Note the two distant shaded areas, each denoted as D, which fall on this side of these two bold spirals, and the smaller area C, just to the right of A.
    These bold spirals serve as lines of demarcation between regions of convergent and divergent IDDIs.  Their orientation is purely arbitrary, since the amount of spiraling caused by an orbiting wave is unknown.
    Considering only the effect on spiral configuration A, the total effect of the far right region D, which extends infinitely outward, exceeds the total effect of the far left region C, which is always smaller by the amount, apportioned to the small region D just to the left of A.  This means that the final effect of these three exterior regions (C-D-D) causes a net divergent IDDI on spiral shell A.  This is also true for the interior regions C-D, where D is greater than C, adding to this outcome.
    From this cursory evaluation, one can conclude that like spirals will repel each other.
    In the evaluation of two unlike spiral configurations, two drawings must be used:  one where the spiral configurations are close together and the other where they are farther apart.
    If the two spirals are close together, five regions are set up.  There is a neutral region where region D2 and C2 blend, resulting in an indeterminate outcome.  Note that regions D2 and C2 fall on the same side of the bold lines of demarcation, and yet produce opposite outcomes.  This is why the neutral region produces no significant outcome one way or the other.

    There is a nearly negligible convergent region C1 just above configuration A and a huge divergent region D1 stretching above and between the two configurations.   Again, a cursory examination will show the net effect on spiral configuration A to be divergent.  In this example, unlike spiral configurations also repel!
    However, if these two spiral configurations are drawn very far apart, as shown following, two very small, nearly equivalent, and presumably offsetting, divergent and convergent interior regions result, as well as a huge convergent region (C) stretching above and between the two configurations.  Ostensibly, the net effect for somewhat distant unlike spiral configurations is attractive.

    With these understandings, one can easily imagine the complete correspondence between spiral configurations and particles of the real world bearing mass, magnetism, spin, inertia, color, and in this example, charge.
    In reference to charge alone, both repulsive and attractive impulses are demonstrated, with maximum peaking, equivalent to a unit charge in the real world, which is governed by the maximum winding of spiral configurations, in turn governed by field noise;  a behavior quite like Coulomb's law.