![]() |
The Society for the
Diffusion of Knowledge
P.O. Box 964, Kaunakakai, HI 96748 |
|
The surfaces comprising the Random Field are neither fixed nor at rest.
As a direct result, the field is filled with incessant activity, referred
to as noise. Much of this activity is translated by the lateral,
non-inertial movement of surfaces and simple field waves.
Strictly
on its theoretical behavior, a simple wave is thought to be analogous to
electromagnetic quanta (light/photons/neutrinos).
A simple wave is two dimensional shape, with a finite wave diameter and
a finite speed,
traveling through a three-dimensional field; its overall rectilinear
path is tunnel shaped, but of course, zig-zagged from surface to surface,
as it follows an orthogonal re-direction from surface to surface.
The wave may normally be thought of as a uniform distribution of motion,
when such motion coincides to a surface. In the absence of coincidence,
such motion is unknown observationally.
At the very center of the wave, this motion is maximum, uniformly diminishing
at its edges, thus marking the perimeter of the wave, which may be thought
of as circular, or nearly circular, in which case, the wave diameter would
be the diameter of this circle, roughly speaking.
The maximum speed of this wave is thought to approach some constant, where
such a maximum occurs randomly, perhaps statistically following a standard
bell shaped distribution. This is based on centuries of scientific
measurement of the speed of light in air and in vacuo, with some of the
older observations falling closer to the mean than newer.
These studies, for the most part, were performed long before Albert Einstein
came upon the scene and no where reflect his opinion, without fundamental
basis, the light must travel at a fixed and exact speed in any fixed medium.
Such a behavior is entirely consistent with this study, simply because
there is no established theoretical mechanism which might alter wave speed
as each wave travels through the field of surfaces, but only its direction.
One might say that of the two components of wave velocity, one remains
fixed and the other is variable.
When such motion manifest coincidentally to a surface, its approach, before
impinging with that surface, may come from any angle, but, once associated
with that surface, is motion is deemed properly perpendicular to that surface;
longitudinal directions along the surface being meaningless.
In this accord, under different conditions of the field, in terms of its
general surface orientation, will cause the wave to follow specific paths,
such that in a field of purely random surfaces orientation, the wave will
follow a zig-zagged path, appearing straight (rectilinear) to the observer,
macroscopically.
In the following illustration, the wave energy is frozen as it is ready
to leave the tenth surface. Note that the wave is redirected with
each surface shown. This is an idealized representation which assumes
that the wave undergoes interchange with every surface shown, though statistically
on average, it would undergo interchange with every other surface.
It is estimated that the entire distance across this illustration (eleven
somewhat
parallel surfaces), is somewhere in the neighborhood of 10-35
centimeters.
[READ]
This sequence of individual processes is not subject to frictional losses,
and may proceed unabated indefinitely.

What we have is wave motion, which if occurring in other than free space,
would be occurring within a field of surfaces; each sufficiently
close together so that waves may move from surface to surface without decay.
We also have choices as to the shape
of the wave, such as being either transcendental, damped or bell shaped.
If you will then, imagine a vibrant field of surfaces, so close together
that these waves may readily pass through the field without convolution
leading to decay; though we know that at times, under certain circumstances
of low field density, these waves will ultimately decay into many smaller
waves of respective distributions of motion.
Imagine
then within the Random Field one surface bulging out to meet another. Upon
encounter, interchange may or may not happen, being that there is a fifty-fifty
chance. In this example, let's say it does not, the first surface passing
through the second, only to encounter another surface. Let's say that interchange
fails again and again to happen, eventually causing the first surface to
bulge outward to the extent that it begins to auto-convolute.

When this happens there is a simple rule. Since interchange happens only half the time; each encounter at a new point of non-definity has only a 0.5 probability of resulting in interchange. Thus the total probability for any given surface to undergo interchange within a group of N surfaces can be expressed as:
understood
that these lines represent the location of a given surface as it intercepts
a flat plane, called a K-plane, common to all surfaces within that particular
illustration. The K-plane is purely imaginary, aiding the manner of illustration.
When one sees these lines, they should always regard them as being surfaces.




Geometrically self evident, if a wave approaches a whole series of surfaces
whose curvatures are concave to its approach, its wave size will swell,
increasing its wave diameter. Conversely, if it approaches a whole
series of surfaces which are convex to its approach, its wave size will
diminish.


A simple wave (l) moving through the field
will become redirected by each new surface it undergoes interchange.
Here we see a simple wave shown as a red arrow moving about a section of
the field consisting of a radial
array
of surfaces. These surfaces are radial because they all pass through
each other at a common axis. One surface is shown in blue, because
it is canted to the group. When the simple wave encounters this surface,
it will be redirected orthonormally to this surfaces, as illustrated by
the blue arrows. The circle defines the path of such a simple wave
in a field of a much higher density of surfaces than shown here.
If we were to trace the path of this wave as shown, it would follow an
outward spiral away from the axis.
Noteworthy to say, there will be other surfaces canted in the opposite
direction, offsetting each other overall, such that the circular path as
shown, tends not to drift along the radial axis. The precision of
radial alignment is not such that all surfaces will pass through a common
axis, but only near it. Remember, this is a random order of surfaces
with specialized alignment taking place, such as polarization, or as in
this last example, the surfaces accidentally being ushered into a radial
array by conditions present at the moment.
Go here if you would like to see animation of a simple wave moving through the field.