HIT CONTROL D TO BOOKMARK THIS PAGE IN YOUR BROWSER

ELEMENTARY PARTICLE ANALOGUES

TO HOME PAGE

Just as a randomly generated spiral configuration is stable, so are both the inside-shelled and outside-shelled spirals, as decay products, stable.

These behaviors are not contrived nor artificial, but dependent upon collective surface behavior, along with a smattering of lines and points, the latter having little influence or affect on the matter.

Essentially what we have and what immediately meets the eye, is a collection of waves and configurations: waves which can be large or small, waves which though traveling in a zig-zagged fashion microscopically, follow a macroscopically rectilinear path within an isotropic field, and a curved path in a radial field; spiral configurations of left- and right-handedness; and spiral configurations consisting of inside or outside shells, not to mention a whole series of relationships involving action-at-a-distance between these configurations, as well as polar affects.

When scientists are asked what a photon's shape is, their answer is usually indeterminate, which is also the case with electrons; both being said to be small. Protons and neutrons are in comparison, larger, ill-defined globs. More exacting are the descriptions concerning charge, half-life, spin and mass, as well as some specific behavioral descriptions, such as the rectilinear propagation of photons, except in close proximity of rather large masses, such as the sun, which causes grazing light beams to bend. The simple field wave, which we have been using and discussing, shares behavior similar to that of photons, such as following a rectilinear path in an isotropic field, and following a curved path in a radial field. What other similarities are there?

A photon is said to have a spin of one, which means that within a magnetic field, they may be oriented in any direction. Also, a photon is of little or no mass and without an electrostatic charge. They also come in a narrow range of speeds, peaking at c, and limited wavelengths ranging from sub-radio to a high-end cutoff at cosmic ray energies. Lastly, they are stable. If within this hypothesis there is an analogue to a photon, it would be a simple wave, or perhaps two traveling together.

The notion that a photon is two simple waves traveling together relates very nicely to two axes consistent to a photon, namely one being the magnetic axis and the other the electric axis, essential to polarization.   At this point, it is a question of similarities.

First of all, simple waves are stable, can be oriented any direction in the field, travel in a straight path, albeit zig-zagged microscopically, and a curved path in radial fields, such as radial fields surrounding individual field configurations, radial arrays within the field or collections of field configurations.
Lastly, field waves have no charge, as do not photons.

The outside-shelled spiral, usually as a decay product from the unstable radial configuration, is thought to be substantially smaller than the other decay product, the inside-shelled spiral. Though both might spontaneously arise from the field, as decay products, they have opposite spiraling, and thus opposite charges. If for a moment we might allow the radial configuration to be the neutron's parton counterpart, a similarity is seen. Neutrons decay into opposite charged particles, as does the radial configuration decay into opposite spiraled configurations, where the direction of spiraling determines charge, so-to-speak, in this hypothesis. And, where one of these decay products is outside-shelled, the other is inside-shelled. If the outside shelled spiral demonstrates little mass, a constant tendency to move through the field, the ability to move in a curved path in a radial field and is comparatively small to an inside-shelled spiral, one begins to suspect such a decay product might be akin to a charged electron or positron, the charge of either being dependent upon the spiral direction.

Conversely, the other decay product, the inside-shelled spiral, as mentioned is larger, tends not to move in the field, and demonstrates mass, inertia and relativistic behavior, which suggests that it might be akin to either a proton or anti-proton parton.

Obviously we do not have yet a direct analogue correspondence, but only a strong pattern of similarities between field configurations and a particle.

In both cases, all decay products are stable and demonstrate opposite charges per couple produced.

This comparison is quite "pure", not taking into account beta-decay, which in my opinion, despite proponents of neutrinos, remains as a theoretical necessity and certainly not a discovery of neutrinos. Considering the fact that at their time of verification, the Brookhaven experiments of 1961 through 1962, only 51 events which might be attributable to neutrino collision were detected out of 10¹⁴ high energy bombardments! Unfortunately, scientist and student alike tend to forget that this is not a substantial yield, quickly declaring the existence of neutrinos.

The untested theoretical insistence that neutrinos might exist, is not suitably resolved by any low-yield experiment, with some remote possibilities of theoretical variation, such as neutrinos and photons being one-in-the-same, but at exceptionally different wavelengths;  one able to penetrate matter, the other not.

Since at this level of study, the necessity of conserving momentum, energy or spin have not been proposed, the neutrino is not a necessary aspect of radial decay. Since neutrinos share characteristics similar to photons, there is the implication that if neutrinos do exist, they are one-the-same to simple waves, and quite a bit smaller than the average simple wave.

If this were to be the case, extreme solar activity could generate a vast amount of exceptionally small waves, which despite being exactly the same as a photon, cannot readily propagate through space between the earth and sun.  Presumably though, as a matter of sheer probability, some of these small photons, able to penetrate materials with the same difficulty as their penetration through space, make it and are detected in deep tunnels inside the earth;  something a photon, because of its larger size, cannot do.

I have made little attempt to evaluate the possibilities of more heavy particles, but believe them to be an odd and fleeting assortment of field configurations consisting of more than two orbiting waves; accounting for their rarity and brief lives. The following chart represents the present range of possibilities associated with this hypothesis.

THE

Since the time of this writing, considerable progress has been made in the identification of the quark, which now indicates that very special field relationships occurs relating to six colors, up and down observational relationships, an explanation for the eight fold way, left-handedness and right-handedness, charge less than the electron, multiple wave photons expressing better polarization characteristics and the non-symetry between matter and anti-matter in our part of the universe.