SECTION HOME          ALPHABETICAL INDEX
III    ORIGIN OF A SURFACE

A.    Because existence and non-existence may be equated as being one-in-the-same; each having identical characteristics and both mutually exclusive because (1) both are perceived as universally permeable throughout Reality and (2) because categorically each is conceived as being diametrically opposed, neither empty space nor non-existence can exist.  Accordingly, it can be directly surmised that only existence exists throughout the unbounded Cosmos as homogeneous substance.  In both Dynamic Geometry and Surface Mechanics, such substance is referred to as the Infinite Volume.  Though the Infinite Volume was initially discovered as substance, it serves in a dual role as form, being represented as (a, a, a) along any three orthogonal axes within it.
    As form, the Infinite Volume belongs to a class of four forms, uniquely common in the measure of their simplicity, and hence probability of occurrence (P), where the probability of existence is inversely proportional to their complexity (C) as depicted in the following table:
 

COMPLEXITY(C)
P
EXAMPLES
SIMPLICITY
a
0
?
LEAST SIMPLE
0>C<a
0>P<1.0
A HOUSE MADE OF BRICKS
SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN
0
1.0
INFINITE VOLUME, SURFACE, LINE POINT
MOST SIMPLE
    What this means is that all four forms each have the highest chance of existing;  more than anything else.  It also means that any number of each may exist throughout the Cosmos.
    Just as it would be inconceivable that "a perfect vacuum" could be created, the same is true of the Infinite Volume, along with the other members of its family in the class of form.  Each exists, because no other option is probable, principally because their degree of complexity is zero.
    In respect to the destruction of any, this would seem implausible, because there is nothing to destroy.  Thus as both form and substance, the Infinite Volume (Being) is temporally permanent.  Likewise, as form superimposed within the Infinite Volume, points, lines and surfaces are also permanent.
    Despite this theorized permanency of the surface, there is the observational suggestion, that though a surface cannot be annihilated, it can be drastically alter to the extent that its theorized definition is violated.  What I believe to be an imperial example of this, is the Great Wall in astronomy.

SECTION HOME          ALPHABETICAL INDEX