SECTION
HOME ALPHABETICAL
INDEX
III
ORIGIN OF A SURFACE
A. Because
existence and non-existence may be equated as being one-in-the-same; each
having identical characteristics and
both mutually exclusive because (1) both are perceived as universally permeable
throughout Reality and (2) because categorically each is conceived as being
diametrically opposed, neither empty space nor non-existence can exist.
Accordingly, it can be directly surmised that only existence exists throughout
the unbounded Cosmos as homogeneous substance. In both Dynamic Geometry
and Surface Mechanics, such substance is referred to as the Infinite Volume.
Though the Infinite Volume was initially discovered as substance, it serves
in a dual role as form, being represented as (a,
a, a) along any three orthogonal axes
within it.
As form,
the Infinite Volume belongs to a class of four
forms, uniquely common in the measure of their simplicity, and hence probability
of occurrence (P), where the probability of existence is inversely proportional
to their complexity (C) as depicted in the following table:
|
COMPLEXITY(C)
|
P
|
EXAMPLES
|
SIMPLICITY
|
|
a
|
0
|
?
|
LEAST SIMPLE
|
|
0>C<a
|
0>P<1.0
|
A HOUSE MADE OF BRICKS
|
SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN
|
|
0
|
1.0
|
INFINITE VOLUME, SURFACE,
LINE POINT
|
MOST SIMPLE
|
What this
means is that all four forms each have the highest chance of existing;
more than anything else. It also means that any number of each may
exist throughout the Cosmos.
Just
as it would be inconceivable that "a perfect vacuum" could be created,
the same is true of the Infinite Volume, along with the other members of
its family in the class of form. Each exists, because no other option
is probable, principally because their degree of complexity is zero.
In respect
to the destruction of any, this would seem implausible, because there is
nothing to destroy. Thus as both form and substance, the Infinite
Volume (Being) is temporally permanent. Likewise, as form superimposed
within the Infinite Volume, points, lines and surfaces are also permanent.
Despite
this theorized permanency of the surface, there is the observational suggestion,
that though a surface cannot be annihilated, it can be drastically alter
to the extent that its theorized definition is violated. What I believe
to be an imperial example of this, is the Great
Wall in astronomy.
SECTION
HOME ALPHABETICAL
INDEX