The Society for the Diffusion of Knowledge P.O. Box 964, Kaunakakai, HI 96748

    A radial array resting in the field experiences a radial "exertion" caused by the surrounding field.  This exertion is caused by geometric mechanisms which cause adjacent field surfaces to attempt to become more parallel with each other, despite being impossible in conjunction to radials which are forced into this condition by the counter rotating dual-waves.  It is because of this continuous and unattainable relationship between essentially opposing behaviors, it is referred to as a exertion, rather than an impulse, force, stress or strain.
    If this exertion is able to manifest, it essentially causes a lateral displacement of field surfaces;  the radial field surfaces (radials) of the radial array pictured.  The blue vectors illustrate the possible direction of these displacements, always and in every case, directed normal to any radial.
    The blue ring represents a valid location of the assessment of this manifestation, set at a radius outside the radial core and well away from the exterior field.
    The region of generation of this exertion is marked by an inner radius (not shown) where radials begin to interact with other surfaces not associated with the array, such as ambient field surfaces, or radials from other nearby arrays.
    This behavior is symmetrical to the axis of rotation of the two waves associated with this dual-wave radial configuration, and most pronounced near the orbital plane of the dual waves.  This mechanism does not manifest in polar regions associated with the axis of rotation.
    Throughout this region of activity, field noise is everywhere, causing numerous yet finite  initializations of the process of interchange.
    Radials which are not moving experience an equivalent balance of these initializations.  Radials which are moving, experience fewer initializations from the rear and more on their leading side.  This imbalance will cause more impulses towards the front, causing a continuous forward stress on the radial array.  Consequently, arrays that are moving will tend to want to continue to move through the field.  This is inertia.
    Frontals (dashed) passing through the radial core likewise experience this same differential, but in the opposite direction, forcing them to leave the array and return back into the ambient field.  This is momentum.

    As the array moves at ever increasing speeds, frontals which would be normally exit the core by being pushed behind do so at a decreasing rate, as the field noise is unable to catch up with the faster moving radials and associated field surfaces in close proximity to the array.
    Field noise is a complex assortment of simple waves generally as decay products due to auto-convolution of small simple waves (neutrinos) and simple waves whose wave diameters are greater than 3h (photons).
    Both neutrinos and photons are considered the primary waves of finite astronomical regions of the Random Field, with the fastest speeds V_max.   Waves resulting from the auto-convolution acquire speeds generally less than V_max.  Accordingly, if the array is traveling at V_max, no field waves will overtake it and the stress producing a backward momentum will completely abate, causing an infinite buildup of captured frontals at the array's core, a condition which pragmatically, based upon theory, most likely cannot be achieved in the real.

    Due to the same process causing inertial and momentum stress, approaching frontals in this case start to conform to the radials, which slowly bending them as they get closer and closer to the array's core.  Here they become closely matched in both position and shape to that of corresponding radials passing through the core.
    As they exit the core, due to stress momentum, the process repeats itself, but in reverse, forcing the frontals to bend backwards to the rear as they continue to conform to the radials.  As they fall behind the array into a region where the radials have little effect, they begin to straighten as they take the shape of the ambient field surfaces.
    Unlike the inertial and momentum conforming processing cause by field noise, this process is caused by the engagement of radials and frontals exclusively as they are forced to collide by the moving array.  The conforming process, being the direct result of IDDI, is a process occurring over a period of the initiation and execution everywhere the frontals and radials impinge upon each other as they collide.
    The faster the array moves through the field, the more quickly a frontal must respond to completely bend, a process variation not possible, hence the frontal will not bend as much as it otherwise might with a slower moving array.  This happens with all frontals, causing a flattened conformation throughout the array.
    The flattening effect has a positive feedback as the more flattened frontals become radials, themselves now more flattened.  Since the new flattened radials are governing the conformation process, the next group of frontals will bend even less without any increase in the array's speed.

    In the case of an earth moving through a field,  we see the approach of an ambient field surface (dashed) approaching (positions A,  B and C), passing through (C, D and E) and leaving the earth (E and F). 
    Any surfaces deemed as being part of earth, must be bent in a fashion conforming them to the general shape of all surfaces passing through it.  This is a dynamic process, where approaching surfaces begin to match the surface contours of those surfaces belonging to earth array, and then as they leave, they reconform to the general contours of ambient field surfaces.
    The field of course is no different than luminiferous ether which scientist were searching for a century ago.
    The most famous attempt in observer this ether was the Michelson-Morley Experiment, which theoretically, as positive proof of ether, needed a .4 fringe variation, where in fact, only 1/40^th of this was observed.
    If scientists then knew that either slowed down as it passed through the earth's core, just as with a radial array, the experiment might have been seen as a success.
    This reduction of speed of the field results from frontals being bent towards the earth as they approach, creating a region of depletion just ahead of the earth, with an increase in the density of frontals inside the earth;  their congestion slowing them down as they pass through the earth.
    By simple examination of the above right illustration, the depletion region is about six to ten times the earth's diameter;  meaning that the earth's apparent speed through the ether at the earth's surface, where these experiments were conducted, is six to ten times slower than otherwise expected from astronomical measurements of the earth's orbital speed around the sun.
    If one were to measure the passing field further away to the side of the earth, it would be similar to a laminar flow with a maximum speed equivalent to the earth's actual speed through the field.
 
 

   Everyone knows that the pendulum's swing at the north pole does not follow the rotation of the earth, but remains fixed to the celestial sphere, in complete contradiction to quantum physics, relativity and the Standard Model;  something that Ernst Mach speculated over a century ago;  before these modern offshoots of classical physics.
        "What is the frame of reference in which centrifugal and Coriolis forces vanish, the frame where Newton's laws work? Observationally, we find that this Newtonian or inertial frame is one in which the distant galaxies are not rotating. But if we removed everything in the universe except the earth, how would we know if the earth were turning or not? How would the pendulum know whether to precess or not? Or, to put the question formally, is it just a coincidence that the frame in which the distant galaxies do not rotate is an inertial frame? Ernst Mach thought not, and speculated that the distant stars must somehow affect inertia (Mach's Principle), but no-one has yet come up with a successful and elegant theory. The recent cosmological hypothesis of the inflationary universe offers hope of a different resolution: if the universe expanded exceedingly rapidly in its early phase, any initial rotation will have slowed down correspondingly and so the distant objects have almost no rotation".   -Wikipedia Relativity Site.
 
 

    In this study, field configurations are in every sense locked to the field's orientation, just as their position and motion is related to field surfaces.  But to make this assertion, the observer must establish the field's null rest and absolute orientation.  This of course may be done by convention.  For one, we may say that the mean or average motion of surfaces represents null rest.  And, as far as orientation goes, we may establish a family of nearly flat and nearly parallel surfaces (intersections permitted) pointing in a certain direction which we arbitrarily label.
    This family of surfaces (shown on edge as lines) in the illustration to the left, the surfaces are shown as being stationary (null rest)  with a simple wave moving through towards the right.
    By these conventions, we may say that the top frame of this image is UP and that the image frame represents rest.  Of course, there are other directional combinations.
 
 

    Ostensibly, earth's passage is sweeping the field by bringing field surfaces to itself, where they congregate in much greater density than they would if the earth were to be at rest.  The faster the earth goes, the more surfaces held by it;  a form of mass increase with increasing speed.  Even if surfaces did not undergo this effect, the same would be true.  Essentially, the faster an object goes, the greater number of surfaces can be associated to it in time, thus the greater the mass.  Mass then, is proportional to the number of surfaces which are associated with and pass through an object during a fixed interval of time.
    Once this process was fully understood, as well as its implications, the notion of mass, inertia, momentum and relativistic mass increase, required inquiry.  Since the number of surfaces thought to be captive to a dual-wave configuration should be of constant value within a field of constant density, and since the mass of a dual-wave configuration (as a neutral quark) should closely relate to its real-world counterpart, the effective mass of a single surface in association to this field configuration can be estimated:
    Given that the neutron's mass is 939.553 x 10⁶ electron volts (EV), and that it comprises6 x 10¹⁰ surfaces, the effective mass per surface is,

    Surface mass = 939.553 x 10⁶ EV / 6 x 10¹⁰ = 1.6 x 10^-2 EV.

    This is not relativistic mass, but mass equated to a three-dimensional system without time, and though surfaces bear no intrinsic mass, in conjunction with a field array caused to undergo motion within the field, the number of surfaces associated to a field array would at least be directly proportional to the mass effect.  In the case of a photon (akin to a simple field wave which moves with an unaltered speed throughout the field, but with directional variation),  moving from surface to surface as it propagates through the field, it would spend part of its time on one surface and part of its time on two.  One might say that the average is 1.5 surfaces, giving the photon an average mass of .024 EV, though it is currently recognized as not having any mass.