![]() |
The Society for the
Diffusion of Knowledge
P.O. Box 964, Kaunakakai, HI 96748 |
|
better
understanding, particularly in respect to the dissociation process (d).
[7-8] CMB + CGY = C1+1 + 2dOne convergent mechanism of this process occurs along the polar axes between two cyan quarks which belong to separate trions. Besides, being only a convergent process, it may also be a divergent process; a coupling between quarks, a magnetic coupling, obeying the rules of magnetism: where like poles facing repel, and unlike poles facing each other attract.
In the [7-8]
interaction (trions 7 and 8), the green and magenta quarks would ordinarily
attract each other along the Y-plane (normal to the Y-axis) by electrostatic
coupling, as would the blue and yellow quarks along their Z-plane (normal
to the Z-axis), leaving two cyan quarks whose polar axes are collinear
or nearly collinear and parallel to the X-axis of a left-hand rectangular
coordinate frame of reference, to attract along their polar axes by magnetic
coupling. There are no red quarks in this coupling.
counter rotating photons which no longer wind the field into spirals, thus
making them neutral. These two quarks carry no charge and have the
possibility of demonstrating mass.
Applies to
both radial and spiral configurations.
At long range,
lateral coupling is the fundamental mechanism for gravitation and spiral
coupling. For radial configurations, it is only an attractive effect.
For spiral configurations it is both an attract effect and a repulsive
effect.
The rule for lateral
coupling for spiral configurations, geometrically
determined, is that like spirals on the same plane tend to repel, and
that unlike spirals tend to attract.
At short range,
10-15
meters, lateral coupling for all configurations merges into far more powerful
forces, overriding the weaker long range forces, though all owe their independent
effects to a common mechanism. These mechanisms, at their root, are
always geometric behaviors, which can display immutable conflict and stress.
They have no breaking point nor compromise. These close-in forces
are both attractive or repulsive, and are not additive, being that they
share a singular mechanism.

The rule for
axial coupling when two of these charged spiral configurations line up
on the same axis, is that "like" poles repel and "unlike" poles attract,
the latter condition drawing the charged spiral configurations into coincidence
and mutual dissociation, releasing two simple waves back into the field.
In the following illustration, charged spiral configurations 1 and 2 are
repelling axially (red), 2 and 3 are attracting axially, charged spiral
configurations 3 and 4 on the same plane are attracting radially (blue),
as are 4 and 5, and finally 5 and 4 on the same plane, as "like" charged
spiral configurations are repelling.

Once a radial
appears in the field, its radial field will attract other radials by virtue
of this following geometric mechanism.
In the adjacent
illustration, two radials (R1 and R2) are shown whose orbital planes are
slightly displaced from each. The axis of R1 is directed into the
screen, its plane of rotation parallel to the screen, and its radial field
is directed radially ou
toward,
more so than along the axis. The hashed area represents the plane
of rotation of radial R2. Its axis is represented by the very short
bold straight line just to the right of center of R1. The two short
vectors show the counter rotating waves of R1. The two waves comprising
R2 are not shown but are understood to lie on R2's orbital plane.
Both of these
waves may be at any location around R2's orbital plane: either one
or the other wave traveling upwards or downwards along the edges, or left
or right over the top or bottom. Waves traveling upwards or downwards
are hardly affected by R1's radial field because they are primarily traveling
parallel to its surfaces. However, waves traveling across left or
right encounter many radial surfaces emanating from R1 and will change
directions based upon the orientation of these radial surfaces relative
to their own radial surfaces supporting their own array.
In this specific
case all waves traveling left or right above and below axis A2 will experience
a re-direction inward towards R1 because all waves traveling in a radial
field will follow a curved path around its axis (A1).
MIGRATION TO COINCIDENCE OF RADIAL CENTERS
Once radials
occur within a finite region of the field, they will tend to migrate towards
each other in a manner commensurate to this described mechanism.
Since these
radials
form
in any manner of orientation, as they gravitate towards each other, their
original orientations will undergo adjustment, due to this same mechanism,
so that once their centers coincide with each other, their orientations
will approach being orthogonal, during the formation of the radial-3.
In this adjacent
illustration we see the approach of three radials forming radial-3, giving
it a total of six orbiting waves.
The stability
of this new configuration depends upon the stability of any one of the
three radials, each being subject to radial decay.
POLAR COUPLING
For any given
radial, after each wave establishes a similar orbital radius to the other,
they will continue to tunnel around center by virtue of axial restoration
as well as radial restoration. Both of these influences are the same,
except that they are directed differently. As each wave passes through
the other wave, each traveling in the other's path, they are forced to
comply to the other's orbit. This is shown following.

Thus as each
wave passes the other, it strikes out on a path more closely following
the other. This restores each wave to a common orbital distance from
the radial center. This process goes on indefinitely with each passage,
maintaining a momentarily stable radial configuration, whose waves progressively
and together move outward from the radial center.
If the waves
are traveling in the same orbital direction, such as with a CC dion, though
attracted by polar coupling, each wave as it draws within the other wave's
field distortion, will tend to diverge from the the other's orbital plane.
In the case of two waves, one might ask, what keeps these waves rotating
near each other? What keeps them from wandering off? Certainly radial restorative
mechanism has little to do with this, since it provides only axial cohesiveness.
In
order to visualize this mechanism, maintaining both counter rotating waves
orbiting near or on the same plane, we must view the radial configuration
from the side.
In this illustration, the radial configuration
seen from the side, let's assume both waves to be slightly displaced from
each other. In other words, their orbital planes are not coplanar. As each
wave moves forward, it moves through the field set up by the other wave
in its passage; a field where each surface is angled, such that its orthogonal
redirection deflects its passage towards the plane of the other wave, thus
both waves are driven towards the common ground lying between their orbital
planes. It does not matter which side which wave is on, in either case
both waves are deflected inward towards the middle. This is called
polar restoration of counter rotating waves, and directly relates to magnetic
properties.
SPIRAL CONFIGURATION AND RADIAL CONFIGURATION STABILITY
Since all surfaces associated to this radial order are moving and not glued to it, each and all will eventually dissociate themselves from it. Each time though this wave circulates around the radial center, it will displace surfaces slightly forwards relative to its forward motion and their original positions. But depending upon the orientation of field surfaces in proximity to the radial order, some will escape interchange simply because the wave is cutting through them at too steep an angle such that it can never bulge into them at a point of non-definity, but rather otherwise intersect them well outside the wave diameter, thus disallowing the possibility of touching without intersecting. This is illustrated showing the wave at position b unable to make contact by simply touching without intersecting; which is essential if a point of non-definity is to occur. In this same illustration, both waves at position a and c can undergo interchange with other field waves

associated with the radial. In the case of the wave at position a, all field surfaces parallel to the line x (shown horizontal) and lying between line a and line x will be driven back towards line x because of IDDI, whereas none lying above line a will undergo interchange. This remains true as the wave continues to move clockwise passing through position b and on to position c. As the wave moves between positions a and c, interchange cannot occur. On the same token, at position b, as the wave drops down towards line x, interchange can occur, driving surfaces upwards. This of course is not conducive in maintaining radial cohesion, but rather defeating it. Fortunately though, on the other side, the wave operates in a much large zone, causing the surfaces to be driven back towards center, the net result, more times the waves will be driven towards center than away. This is true for all reference orientations of line x, as well as for waves traveling counterclockwise.
Within a magnetic field, a photon will encounter surfaces twisted (canted) by the field magnets. Every time the photon (l) undergoes interchange with such as surface (shown in blue) it will undergo redirection (blue arrows). One the average, with the completion of many orbital revolutions, the photon will not experience any net displacement, but rather a tilting of its orbit.

In the right illustration, two
photon orbits (white rings) are shown in a magnetic field between two electromagnets.
The white arrows indicate the direction of the current in each electromagnetic,
which is the same. In both magnets, the north poles are directed
upwards, therefore the field being a basic field directed along the Z axis.
The horizontal
blue surface is unaffected by the magnetic field. The vertical blue
surface is shown prior to the activation of the magnetic field, and afterwards,
being twisted clockwise from a vertically down perspective.
The black
arrows exaggerate the deflection of photons traveling in the rings as they
strike the surface twisted by the magnetic field. In both rings,
photons are deflected downward in the back, and upwards in the front