SECTION HOME          ALPHABETICAL INDEX
The Society for the Diffusion of Knowledge
P.O. Box 964,
Kaunakakai, HI 96748
 
INTERACTIVE MECHANISMS
    Taking the last trion process, the associated mechanism may be scrutinized to gain a better understanding, particularly in respect to the dissociation process (d).
[7-8]    CMB + CGY = C1+1 + 2d
    One convergent mechanism of this process occurs along the polar axes between two cyan quarks which belong to separate trions.  Besides, being only a convergent process, it may also be a divergent process;  a coupling between quarks, a magnetic coupling, obeying the rules of magnetism:  where like poles facing repel, and unlike poles facing each other attract.
    This mechanism is not a force, though measurable as a force in the laboratory, it is a field effect where simple waves in orbit, even standing waves, change direction as they move orthogonally from surface to surface, thus causing a deflection of the general orbital path either away from or towards another quark;  both quarks engaged in this couple acting the same but in opposite directions.
    In the [7-8]  interaction (trions 7 and 8), the green and magenta quarks would ordinarily attract each other along the Y-plane (normal to the Y-axis) by electrostatic coupling, as would the blue and yellow quarks along their Z-plane (normal to the Z-axis), leaving two cyan quarks whose polar axes are collinear or nearly collinear and parallel to the X-axis of a left-hand rectangular coordinate frame of reference, to attract along their polar axes by magnetic coupling.  There are no red quarks in this coupling.
    In this example, trions 7 and 8 will converge to exceptionally close range along their Y and Z axes due to the electrostatic coupling of their green and magenta quark pairs and blue and yellow quark pairs, in conjunction with the cyan pair which is not only just driving them closer together, but into perfect coincidence.
    But, at approximately 10-15 meters, a geometric conflict arises.  Though the two cyan quarks can continue to approach each other until they coincide, neither the blue and yellow quarks and the green and magenta quarks can.  For both pairs, at about 10-15 meters, their convergent "force" turns into what is a nuclear equivalent to a force of repulsion;  exceptionally powerful, which cannot be overridden by the effect of the cyan pair.
    The green and magenta quarks, though undergoing lateral repulsion at close range, also undergo alignment of their planes, a mechanism called polar coupling, where counter rotating waves drive each other towards a middle common plane.
    Though both quarks are unable to perfectly coincide laterally, at distance, their opposite charges effectively are a net neutral, resulting in a counter rotating dual wave neutral quark consisting of two photons.  The same happens to the blue and yellow quarks.
    It is at this moment, virtually instantaneously, both a GM quark is generated and a BY quark;  each possessing counter rotating photons which no longer wind the field into spirals, thus making them neutral.  These two quarks carry no charge and have the possibility of demonstrating mass.
    This abatement of the spiraling process, along with the field noise, produces a stable three-dimensional radial field array around a central core, what is referred to as a GMBY dion and a CC quark with  two photons in orbit under standing wave conditions.
    Under the Yukawa process, a neutral pion will decay into two photons.
    A GMBY dion consisting of two neutral quarks will decay, each quark releasing two photons apiece, making it at this point reasonable to suspect that a neutral quark might be equivalent to a neutral pion.
    If so, where did the decay products come from, they being a CC quark + 2po?
    One possibility is K mesons which can produce neutral pions in groups of two and three.  But how does the CC quark fit in?
    Might we infer that a K01 meson is someway related to a CMB trion and a CGY trion?
 
 







Specialized Mechanisms

LATERAL COUPLING

    Applies to both radial and spiral configurations.
    At long range, lateral coupling is the fundamental mechanism for gravitation and spiral coupling.  For radial configurations, it is only an attractive effect.  For spiral configurations it is both an attract effect and a repulsive effect.
   The rule for lateral coupling for spiral configurations, geometrically determined, is that like spirals on the same plane tend to repel, and that unlike spirals tend to attract.
    At short range, 10-15 meters, lateral coupling for all configurations merges into far more powerful forces, overriding the weaker long range forces, though all owe their independent effects to a common mechanism.  These mechanisms, at their root, are always geometric behaviors, which can display immutable conflict and stress.  They have no breaking point nor compromise.  These close-in forces are both attractive or repulsive, and are not additive, being that they share a singular mechanism.

    The rule for axial coupling when two of these charged spiral configurations line up on the same axis, is that "like" poles repel and "unlike" poles attract, the latter condition drawing the charged spiral configurations into coincidence and mutual dissociation, releasing two simple waves back into the field.
        In the following illustration, charged spiral configurations 1 and 2 are repelling axially (red), 2 and 3 are attracting axially, charged spiral configurations 3 and 4 on the same plane are attracting radially (blue), as are 4 and 5, and finally 5 and 4 on the same plane, as "like" charged spiral configurations are repelling.

POLAR AND LATERAL COUPLING

    Once a radial appears in the field, its radial field will attract other radials by virtue of this following geometric mechanism.
    In the adjacent illustration, two radials (R1 and R2) are shown whose orbital planes are slightly displaced from each.  The axis of R1 is directed into the screen, its plane of rotation parallel to the screen, and its radial field is directed radially outoward, more so than along the axis.  The hashed area represents the plane of rotation of radial R2.  Its axis is represented by the very short bold straight line just to the right of center of R1.  The two short vectors show the counter rotating waves of R1.  The two waves comprising R2 are not shown but are understood to lie on R2's orbital plane.
    Both of these waves may be at any location around R2's orbital plane:  either one or the other wave traveling upwards or downwards along the edges, or left or right over the top or bottom.  Waves traveling upwards or downwards are hardly affected by R1's radial field because they are primarily traveling parallel to its surfaces.  However, waves traveling across left or right encounter many radial surfaces emanating from R1 and will change directions based upon the orientation of these radial surfaces relative to their own radial surfaces supporting their own array.
    In this specific case all waves traveling left or right above and below axis A2 will experience a re-direction inward towards R1 because all waves traveling in a radial field will follow a curved path around its axis (A1).

MIGRATION TO COINCIDENCE OF RADIAL CENTERS

    Once radials occur within a finite region of the field, they will tend to migrate towards each other in a manner commensurate to this described mechanism.
    Since these radials form in any manner of orientation, as they gravitate towards each other, their original orientations will undergo adjustment, due to this same mechanism, so that once their centers coincide with each other, their orientations will approach being orthogonal, during the formation of the radial-3.
    In this adjacent illustration we see the approach of three radials forming radial-3, giving it a total of six orbiting waves.
    The stability of this new configuration depends upon the stability of any one of the three radials, each being subject to radial decay.


POLAR COUPLING
    For any given radial, after each wave establishes a similar orbital radius to the other, they will continue to tunnel around center by virtue of axial restoration as well as radial restoration.  Both of these influences are the same, except that they are directed differently.  As each wave passes through the other wave, each traveling in the other's path, they are forced to comply to the other's orbit.  This is shown following.

    Thus as each wave passes the other, it strikes out on a path more closely following the other.  This restores each wave to a common orbital distance from the radial center.  This process goes on indefinitely with each passage, maintaining a momentarily stable radial configuration, whose waves progressively and together move outward from the radial center.
    If the waves are traveling in the same orbital direction, such as with a CC dion, though attracted by polar coupling, each wave as it draws within the other wave's field distortion, will tend to diverge from the the other's orbital plane.
        In the case of two waves, one might ask, what keeps these waves rotating near each other? What keeps them from wandering off? Certainly radial restorative mechanism has little to do with this, since it provides only axial cohesiveness.
    In order to visualize this mechanism, maintaining both counter rotating waves orbiting near or on the same plane, we must view the radial configuration from the side.

    In this illustration, the radial configuration seen from the side, let's assume both waves to be slightly displaced from each other. In other words, their orbital planes are not coplanar. As each wave moves forward, it moves through the field set up by the other wave in its passage; a field where each surface is angled, such that its orthogonal redirection deflects its passage towards the plane of the other wave, thus both waves are driven towards the common ground lying between their orbital planes. It does not matter which side which wave is on, in either case both waves are deflected inward towards the middle.  This is called polar restoration of counter rotating waves, and directly relates to magnetic properties.

SPIRAL CONFIGURATION AND RADIAL CONFIGURATION STABILITY

    Since all surfaces associated to this radial order are moving and not glued to it, each and all will eventually dissociate themselves from it. Each time though this wave circulates around the radial center, it will displace surfaces slightly forwards relative to its forward motion and their original positions. But depending upon the orientation of field surfaces in proximity to the radial order, some will escape interchange simply because the wave is cutting through them at too steep an angle such that it can never bulge into them at a point of non-definity, but rather otherwise intersect them well outside the wave diameter, thus disallowing the possibility of touching without intersecting. This is illustrated showing the wave at position b unable to make contact by simply touching without intersecting; which is essential if a point of non-definity is to occur. In this same illustration, both waves at position a and c can undergo interchange with other field waves

associated with the radial. In the case of the wave at position a, all field surfaces parallel to the line x (shown horizontal) and lying between line a and line x will be driven back towards line x because of IDDI, whereas none lying above line a will undergo interchange. This remains true as the wave continues to move clockwise passing through position b and on to position c. As the wave moves between positions a and c, interchange cannot occur. On the same token, at position b, as the wave drops down towards line x, interchange can occur, driving surfaces upwards. This of course is not conducive in maintaining radial cohesion, but rather defeating it. Fortunately though, on the other side, the wave operates in a much large zone, causing the surfaces to be driven back towards center, the net result, more times the waves will be driven towards center than away. This is true for all reference orientations of line x, as well as for waves traveling counterclockwise.


MOTION IN A MAGNETIC FIELD

    Within a magnetic field, a photon will encounter surfaces twisted (canted) by the field magnets.  Every time the photon (l) undergoes interchange with such as surface (shown in blue) it will undergo redirection (blue arrows).  One the average, with the completion of many orbital revolutions, the photon will not experience any net displacement, but rather a tilting of its orbit.




In the right illustration, two photon orbits (white rings) are shown in a magnetic field between two electromagnets.  The white arrows indicate the direction of the current in each electromagnetic, which is the same.  In both magnets, the north poles are directed upwards, therefore the field being a basic field directed along the Z axis.
    The horizontal blue surface is unaffected by the magnetic field.  The vertical blue surface is shown prior to the activation of the magnetic field, and afterwards, being twisted clockwise from a vertically down perspective.
    The black arrows exaggerate the deflection of photons traveling in the rings as they strike the surface twisted by the magnetic field.  In both rings, photons are deflected downward in the back, and upwards in the front
 
 



SECTION HOME          ALPHABETICAL INDEX