SECTION HOME          ALPHABETICAL INDEX
The Society for the Diffusion of Knowledge
P.O. Box 964,
Kaunakakai, HI 96748
 
THE UNIVERSAL FIELD
    The point, line and surface are of least complexity; a complexity equivalent to zero.  Since they are without causal mechanism or governing means; each one being impossible to construct or destroy, it is axiomatic that their presence is a matter of extreme possibility, as it is therefor axiomatic that their probability of existence is unity (1.0).  If indeed any one of these can exist, so can many of the same. This means that Being is filled with an infinite number of Forms. This is called the Random Field.
    Simply put, the field is of infinite expanse and eternal and consists of myriad surfaces, lines and points; all bending, convoluting and moving, as the case may be. In order to visualize this, consider the basic backdrop of Being (the Infinite Volume) as being clear and dark, where within it we can see transparent silver surfaces floating like the finest gossamer, but not all aligned the same but with different and varying orientations and movement, all of them cutting through one another as though the others were not even there, and thin spider web like lines of infinite length, floating and bending and passing through the surfaces, and a myriad silver points rushing to and fro, penetrating and passing through one surface after another, and on rarest occasion, striking a line. It is a great grinding, but silent, primordial playground, invisible to direct detection.
    In this illustration of the field, though the surfaces are infinite, they are shown as being finite curved sections within a finite cubic region of the field.  In this illustration, there are five distinct surfaces.  It is quite permitted that these five sections might belong to only one severely convoluted surface that repeatedly passes in and out of this region, or that each is a separate surface.
    Though both points and lines exist as form superimposed within Being, and though both may interact, pragmatically speaking, in relationship to surfaces, their interactions are too infrequent to significantly affect any field behaviors associated with real physical and supernatural activities about which you will soon learn.  Accordingly, though in equity with surfaces otherwise, both are dismissed as being elemental to our Cosmos.  In other words, though surfaces as Fundamental Form are elemental, and hence considered entities, points and lines are not.
    Having said this, do not be misled to think that points exclusively and lines exclusively should be wholly discounted, since both may interact with surfaces, as they do with themselves and each other;  a specific study in itself yet to be undertaken.
    Just as points may collide and undergo interchange fifty percent of the time, a point may collide with either a line or a surface and experience the same response to such a collision.
    In order to avoid the excessive complexity of all possible situations, it is assumed that this study here, of surfaces behavior is statistically affected by point-line activity in the field.  It is however, not factored into the results at the present time, though it is kept in mind that results from surface behavior computer simulations, may be somewhat skewed from the real.
   One of the first questions about the field which we might ask, if given a finite cubic region of the field, say one centimeter square, how many surfaces might be passing through this unit volume?  The current best is estimate, based on the decay of a radial configuration is 1.51 x 1037 surfaces per cm3, along with possibly the same number of points and lines.  This would represent the fine structure of our physical universe;  the ultimate resolution of the size, weight and movement of even the smallest particles.
 

The current estimate for field density is 1.51 x 1037 surfaces per cm3.*

   In the most exotic and esoteric studies concerning natural behavior, the field density is deemed to be inversely proportional to what is called space-gauge;  the mean separation between surfaces.  The space-gauge, as it should be, is remarkably similar in magnitude to Planck's constant lying in the range of 10-34, which represents the least measurable magnitude of photon energy; essentially, the smallest conceivable quanta.
    Taking the value for field density and inverting it gives us the maximum average distance between field surfaces, a value of 6.6 x 10-36 centimeters, a value representing the smallest resolvable magnitude of the field's fine structure.
    The correspondence between these two extremely small and rationally associated numbers demonstrates a profound correspondence between the hypothetical and the real.
   Now as observers sitting on our small earth racing around our bigger sun racing around our yet much larger Milky Way galaxy, we cannot presume this great field to be moving with us, but rather that we are moving through it. Perhaps to a certain extent, our spinning galaxy does in part move the field with it, drawing it along at roughly 200-300 kilometers per second at its edges. This, we cannot be sure, since one might think that some sort of detectable trace, or some variation in the sun's bow break might be noticeable as we both race across this field; having the physical material within us replaced by 3.7 x 1044 surfaces per second! It is a staggering possibility to think that this could be happening, but then again, surfaces are not mass, so the usual material relations do not hold up, notwithstanding inertial as well as relativistic concerns.
    This is the field, which, because of the purely random and rather disorganized order of surfaces which makes it up, it is termed, the Random Field, though I generally refer to it as the field.  All well and good, except that what we have is an inert Supreme Ultimate Being, the Virtue of Motion, and the existence of Form, namely being surfaces.  If this is Nature's bottom line, where's interaction?  After all, the universe you and I know is filled with interaction.
    In Dynamic Geometry we discovered the mechanism of interchange. Of course, we were dealing with imaginary surfaces. Is it possible though, that interchange might work for real surfaces, if in fact there is a field of such surfaces?  If so, we might have the embryonic semblance of interaction at the physical level.
    One requirement is that our surfaces be infinitely thin, which they are. Being infinitely thin, surfaces have no volume. Not having any volume, they cannot have material structure, or structure of any sort. Not having structure, they cannot be rigid, nor contain internal stress or resultant forces. Not being rigid, they are incapable of not moving; hence are willing and able to bend, flex, move and undulate. Of course, not having internal structure, force or stress they can pass through one another without the slightest impediment to each other's motion. All things considered, since our real surfaces and imaginary surfaces share in the same qualities, there is every reason to think that interchange can serve as a potentially real process.
    Significantly, at this level, there is no concept of energy, only Motion, Motion being more elementary than even Form, though it is through Form we see its manifestation. We know that Motion cannot be exchanged and cannot be destroyed anymore than the Forms upon which it manifests cannot be destroyed; in essence all Motion being permanent. Again, Motion is a virtue. Another way to put it. If there are no Forms, we cannot see Motion, even though it is there. Further, it is there despite the presence or non presence of the Being, since such Being is inert and wholly unrelated to Motion, where Motion is a natural option.
    From this we know that though waves themselves might decay, their underlying motion is still there, causing the formation of newer and presumably even smaller waves than before, which then begin their own propagation. Clearly though, if these smaller waves are spawned by the residual motion of larger waves before them, how could they even begin to move through the field? Essentially then, if a wave does decay, the field in this region becomes vibrantly active with the assertion of motion, unable to escape because of a field density which is too low. This is why neutrinos, generated in the sun, are unable to make it to earth in large numbers.  The process again repeats itself, producing more convolution and smaller and smaller waves; a microcosm within itself.
    This process is of course not confined to only one place, but is happening everywhere through the field; essentially pockets of trapped motion trying to reach out, but unable to because of the low density of the surrounding ambient field.
    Eventually though, as each micro-domain grows larger and larger, and new ones are being generated between the old, all eventually encroach upon each other, enriching the overall Random Field with greater density than it had before. This process is considered to be in direct correspondence to the variance of space-gauge, inversely so, which in turn relates to the size of manifest objects in the field.
    When I speak of manifest objects, I am referring to physical objects whose presence results from the field and whose size is determined by the field, something which does not happen to simple field waves.
    Consider then a wholly artificial and contrived object, such as a cube, consisting of twenty-seven smaller cubic regions as part of a very uniform field of orthogonal surfaces. This if of course very unique and unreal, but despite being so, it clearly demonstrates what I am talking about.
    In a past field of a given density (Frame A), this object will be of a certain size, but later, as the field increases in density because of all these decaying waves (Frame B), the same object of twenty-seven cubic regions will be smaller. These dimensions, as they should be, are relative to the observer's standards of measure, in this case frames A and B, which we may consider as being unit dimensions.

    What this tells us is that as the field gets older, objects get smaller, by virtue that the size of objects is inversely proportional to the field density. This of course is one of the foundations of the Mass Decrement Cosmological Model, since simple waves, thought to be analogous to photons, are not manifest field objects, and are therefor unaffected by this changing field density (variable space-gauge). Thus after traveling vast time and distance, these simple waves remain very much the same as they did at their time of emission, despite the rest of the real, material world of matter, getting smaller.
    The study of the field and surface go hand in hand.  One cannot imagine what the field is without an introduction to surfaces.  If one attempts to fully understand what surfaces are capable, especially vast collections of surfaces, then the understanding of the field is invaluable.
    For example in the case of inertia, which is caused by surfaces, along with mass and relativity, one needs to consider the motion of huge field objects, such as the earth, as well as individual configurations.  Once one begins to associate microcosm with macrocosm, the whole role of surfaces becomes more apparent.  For example, over 2,600 years ago, did anyone fully understand Anaximander's notion of the same;  that these apeiron of which he spoke were everywhere manifest:  inside us and outside us stretching everywhere throughout the Cosmos;  passing through the earth and all celestial bodies?
    When one visualizes a basic radial configuration consisting of two counter rotating simple waves in temporary orbit, itself representative of a quark of one quantum chromatic color, it is not simply isolated in this visualization, but rather part of a great disorganized field of ambient surfaces, which to the student, must no doubt play a role in its behavior, both static and kinetic.
    It has been forty years since the onset of this great study, and now, having come to fruition, every day there are new developments, such as the explanations for inertia, momentum, mass increase, foreshortening, luminiferous ether, Mach's universal inertia, null rest and mass equivalence.  Go here for these.
    If you would like to know more about why three quarks make a TRION and a TRION is also three OSSs whose spin axes are normal to each other, obeying quantum chromodynamic principles, and why such an OSS may be either an electron or a positron, or why an ISS may be either a proton or anti-proton, plus more, go here.
    More recent studies within this great new discipline, which I call Surface Physics, concern Time and Force, and Impulse and Exertion.  If you would like to find out more about gravitation, and why as a weak force it belongs to a common group of both strong and weak forces, inclusive of nuclear forces of repulsion and attraction, all of which have the same common mechanism, go here.  To find our more on forces of charge, or what are called Coulumb forces or static-electricity, go here.
    All of these afor mentioned forces have the same common mechanism, the only difference being is that only spiral configurations, such as ISSs anf ISSs, may generate elcectrical charge and magnetism, with modest exception.  For more on a fully developed explanation for magnetism, go here.

SECTION HOME         ALPHABETICAL INDEX