ALIEN INTERVENTION

    IT SEEMS TO ME, that if god chose to intervene, as he did so, casting my wife into a closed chrysalis state, where she can neither speak nor move, all because he did not want people to know that he did not create the Universe, then should not those with the same capability do the same, to restore her back to the way she was?

    SHE HAS JUST GONE TO SLEEP, after being bathed, fed and turned.  I do this alone, because the church goers on the island where I live, see no need to help.  It is just past one thirty AM.

    WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO EVERYONE, not just people, but the gods and the star travelers?  Are they all afraid of the Truth?  Or, are they just jealous of someone else finding it?  So many could help, but none do.

    IT IS SAD.  When my wife and I first discussed having children, we decided to have only one, so other people around the world could have more children, and so that there would be more room for animals.  Now when she most needs them most, there is but one to help, and he is far away.

    OF COURSE THERE IS NOTHING HE CAN DO, for the damage caused to her by god is great;  millions of her brain cells destroyed, and many lost by the doctors at UCLA, who sucked them out.  Did the same god who put the demon in the country doctor* who tried to freeze my grandmother to death, do the same to the doctors at UCLA?

    I AM TIRED NOW.  It is shortly after 2:00 AM.  I just went to see what my wife wanted.  She started moaning a short time ago.  I knew that she wasn't hungry, she was just fed.  I put food directly into her stomach through a tube that goes through her skin.  It is called a G-tube.  There is also a J-tube.  The G stands for gastric (directly into the lower part of the stomach), the J stands for jejunum.  The jejunum is the effluent extension leading from her stomach to her small intestine.  Her J-tube is now removed.  It was placed there by the physicians at UCLA Neurosurgery when the G-tube wasn't working;  her stomach contents were piling up.  It was discovered by them that the interns had incorrectly placed her G-tube balloon such that it was blocking the stomach's opening to her jejunum.  (Perhaps god had a hand in this, or had just fallen asleep.)

    OFTEN AT NIGHT SHE WILL MOAN AT SOMETIME DURING MY TYPING,  mostly when I hit a snag, but never when I have a Hemingway.  When this happens, I think god is enabling the demon of discomfort, just to distract and annoy me.

    GOD IS VERY POWERFUL IN THIS WAY.  He is a master at war, murder, destruction and demons.  Many of his following enjoy this aspect, and worship and celebrate his acts of infanticide.
    As one example, it is said that god set forth his Angel of Death to fly over a desert town at night and kill the firstborn of its people.  Only those who would smear animal blood on their doors might survive.
    Today, many people of many religions both worship this god and his son, and celebrate the event of infanticide, as does even my own sister and her family.

    I ASK YOU, WHAT IS TO PREVENT THIS GOD from doing the same to the occupants of space ships traveling close to the earth?

    I ASK YOU, what is to prevent this god from doing it to anyone he might fear or despise, as he did to Charles Darwin;  laying low his sister, after The Theory of Evolution was announced, as he has lain low my wife?

    FOR GOOD OR FOR WORSE, there have been many gods around planet earth, who have shared the karma with earth's creatures;  mostly its people.  It is ordinarily a mutual spiritual relationship.  The gods enjoy adulation, the people find cause to worship them; this being the karmic will cascading between both, where without, any god is weak, or simply no god at all.

    A GOD IS THE ASCENSION OF AWARENESS, and as such, in comparison to Being, may be considered a singularity.  As with our own selves, within all, there is a tincture of will;  the third facet of change, in conjunction to chance, and cause and effect.  By referring to the Ascent of Awareness, you may understand this better.

    AT THE LEFT of this illustration you see the many gods of man listed.  At the top, there is a narrow aperture between Universal Being and Universal Awareness.  At the very bottom of this illustration is a base layer (yellow), a foundation for ALL that IS.
    Here you see listed the words, existence, non-existence, a, Universal Being, Non-Clinical Being and Allah.  These words do not describe Being, but rather appropriate descriptions as to what it is not or might be.
    Of these, the word couple existence and non-existence emphasize the logical human error in presuming both to be, which is not true.  There is no non-existence anymore than there is existence; a conceptual canard so-to-speak, perhaps motivated by religious scholars to frighten the lay.  (boo!)  In the least, it is a logical misstep leading to centuries of wasted time by scientists in the vain attempt to explain the physical Universe in terms of particles*, rather than a Infinite Field.
    It is thus of course why there is also the symbol alpha (a), representing not only the beginning, but everything eternal (temporally unbounded) and spatially infinite and everywhere.
    At the base of the cone are also found the words, Universal Being;  this being the best description I can give you.  In the order to understand Being the best, these should not be construed to mean Almighty Being, nor Power, nor Energy;  and there are no specifications as to whether Being is Form or Substance exclusively.*
    We also see the words Non-Clinical Being, which imply and mean that Being cannot be dissected and torn apart, or else that which it becomes to the analyst, becomes as well preclusive to Being, relegating then Being to something not so absolute.  Of course, in the same light, Being cannot become a dream within a dream, for the same reason
    Finally, we see the word Allah, in direct reference to the notion somewhat in vogue during the 1930s, at a time when the world's greatest artist, Maxfield Parrish (1870b) produced a scene popular on candy boxes, entitled, "The Garden of Allah".  (Click on picture to see it full size and other paintings by Maxfield Parrish.)
    This was at a time when profound interest and respect existed in the world, when ordinary church goers in the Midwest (U.S.), as one example, enjoyed these confectioneries.  I myself always thought Allah to be a wonderful and enchanting concept brought to people by the prophet Mohammed, though today the conflict between peoples of the world's great religions blunts the beautiful relationship between ourselves as brothers and sisters.
    Within the yellow base are other descriptive words, such as dark, lifeless, apeiron and unbounded, which are completely explained elsewhere in this work.

    WITHIN BEING, there are Universal Being and Universal Awareness.  Let me explain this somewhat redundant statement.  We are well aware of the presence of awareness, having our own, as testament to this.  We also understand that awareness is not necessarily being, but rather a function of Being, at least seemingly so.  Clearly, no less significant is Being.  Knowing that both may pervade all that there is, without boundaries, it might seem that they are somehow connected at the most fundamental level.  But there is no necessity that Being must be aware of itself, such a deduction being of rather anthropomorphic expectation, much like time.  And, as you shall learn, Universal Awareness does not preclude Being, but rather, the reverse is true.

    IT SEEMS THEN, that Awareness is an achievable state without having fundamental, primal cause, in that Being strives to become nothing other than what it already is.

    TO AN AWARENESS, such as ourselves, this seems an untenable condition;  to Be without recognition of such.

    IT ALSO SEEMS, that the greatest awareness is the awareness of all, simultaneously and unbounded;  the third eye of the Indian Subcontinent mysticism:  for to be as such, brings one closer to a state of ultimate bliss.

    THOUGH ANY CREATURE OR WILL, AS AN ASPECT OF BEING, and though Being itself are not compelled to follow this path, there are no rules preventing ascension by any creature or will, as indicated by the orange traces moving upwards through the cone;  these being ascendant singularities.  The arrows represent their upward path towards Universal Awareness, presumably a state for the gods.  Notice one of these traces labeled A GOD.  It is labeled as such, because it stems from a primal level identified as the FIELD, the earliest level coincident to and not preclusive to awareness, such as are the levels of Form and Dynamics.

    OTHER PATHS COME FROM HIGHER LEVELS, such as the Cenozoic on planet Earth, as well as other equivalent periods on other planets.  These are not included in this illustration.  Earthlings should understand that they do not have the corner on gods, in that there are an infinite number of gods in the Cosmos.

    THOUGH UNIVERSAL AWARENESS may be a tangible objective, it is as well an oxy-moron, for how indeed could one explain carnal innocence;  the omission of total understanding and temperance?

    THESE UNDERSTANDINGS lead to more questions concerning the gods of planet earth, particularly the maturity of a god who would intervene by crushing my innocent wife.  It also brings into question the maturity and sound reasoning of those who follow this god and do its bidding.

    FOR EXAMPLE, why would men at the telephone company, Hawaiian Telcom, and at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology block and reroute those who wish to read about what I have to say?  Are they determined and devout, or innocent pawns under god's demonic control.  Why do they incessantly monitor me, scouring my web site for pages containing the words, "god" or "Christian"?

    DO THEY THINK THAT I AS A HEATHEN have no right to voice myself to others, yet they do?

    BOTH OF THEM do this to abridge the Constitution of the United States:  placing this notification on servers directly supporting final access to my web site. You've seen this error message (404 Not Found) before, especially if you go to any culturally prohibited web site, but why mine?

    IF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, George Bush II claims that our Founding Fathers were Christian, yet fails to acknowledge that they were Secularists, I have every right to claim myself, as a citizen of the same nation, to be a Heathen.

    AND AS SUCH, I have every right to express why, and my lack of preference towards anyone else's god, and even why I think their god is bad, non-existent, or that they have made the wrong choice, or that their god could not so much possibly create the Cosmos.  Don't you think so?

    YET THERE ARE MEN IN HIGH PLACES, who act under the guise of the Patriot Act to prohibit these expressions act the cross-roads of the Internet, who can and do commit the same actions as a city official knocking someone off a soap box in a city park, or drag them away into a mental health clinic as they do in many countries around the world.

    THESE HIGH PLACES ARE SANCTIONED by the United States Government under the guise of the Internet Engineering Task Force (EITF) and are known by me firsthand to be Hawaiian Telcom and M.I.T.

    THEY ARE SANCTIONED to peruse my documents as they reside at my web site (Paid for by me.) on a server (Paid by me.) and to legally block access (essentially yanking my bullhorn out of my hands), OR (even worse) to affect the transmissions of my thoughts to my web site through means of live monitoring, as though I was an undesirable.  In other words, before the ink dries, the book is burned!

    EVEN WORSE, there is legislation in Congress to allow the President to shut down the Internet under National Security concerns;  at time of war when none of us should be fighting.  In other words, the voices of moderation telling us not to engage in religious warfare could be virtually silenced because of religious warfare.  Nice!

    TO MAKE IT SEEM PRESENTABLE and perfectly sane to the populace, the matter of censorship is clandestinely assigned to the purview of good reason, taste and sound judgment;  a matter of official yet random and untethered discretion.  This becomes evidently clear when you look at the source code for the "404 Not Found" page (aka: access denied).  It is of course an official and sanctioned lie, increasingly more common now among government agencies, stating:

 "The requested URL /GOD'S was not found on this server.
Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an Error Document to handle the request."

 Following is the source code for this page:
 


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html><head>
<title>404 Not Found</title>
</head><body>
<h1>Not Found</h1>
<p>The requested URL /GOD'S was not found on this server.</p>
<p>Additionally, a 404 Not Found
error was encountered while trying to use an Error Document to handle the request.</p>
</body></html>

    Now you don't need to know much about the Internet to know what's going on.  The red words indicate the type of document, in this case it being a document for public inspection, use and perusal.  Under Federal Law, there are no governing bodies, such as software manufacturers, with the authority to restrict or alter intended usage.
    Within this section are the notations IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN, indicating that this document may be evaluated by the THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE, an international  censorship body manned by people not like me.  There is also the W3C working in close conjunction with M.I.T.'s Computer Department.  They are mostly Jewish or Christian, not heathen.

    THIS IS INTERESTING in that they are not civil servants administering the nation's laws, particularly those concerning our national rights and freedoms, but rather independent organizations who may, by internal standards restrict applicability of any national law, such as the United States Constitution, and particularly the 1st Amendment!  But do you want men of good reason, taste and sound judgment to universally regulate national thought?
    The next link I will show you, goes to these organizations, which have lofty descriptions and great purpose, exactly the doctor's prescription to prevent you from reading what I think.  I can only imagine how much Conservative Congress members like them, by keeping the rift raft out.

    REMEMBER, EVERY COUNTRY HAS ITS RIFT RAFT:  untouchables in India, gentiles for Israel, infidels for Iran, children living in sewer tunnels in Brazil, regular folks in China, Korea and Miramar, nose pickers in Austria and Switzerland and heathens for the U.S.   I think that Christians have a real dislike for heathens, in the past burning them alive was found to be somewhat popular in Salem Massachusetts, if the farmers found too many dead cattle lying around in their pastures.

    THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE is a large open international
community of network designers, operators, vendors, and researchers concerned
with the evolution of the Internet and what dissidents say, no doubt identified by the RFC repository maintained by the IETF Secretariat, as well as the RFC Editor's Web Page, with the purpose to develop and promote Internet standards, cooperating closely with the W3C and ISO/IEC standard bodies, utilizing tools to track dissidents, presumably many located in China and North Korea, from an IETF-specific wordlist built from the last 2 years' published RFCs, surnames of recent I-D authors and some manually added words, such as "bomb", "terrorist", Christian", "god" and "Jewish"!
    With the Internet Engineering Task Force completely and aggressively active, as recently as Jan 22, 2009, they have published the "IETF Journal" and a mailing list serving as a vehicle for the IETF Calendaring and Scheduling (calsch) Working Group.  For additional information, go to http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/I/IETF.html - 59k - Cached.   You may also confirm what I am telling you by going to the Work Group Home Page for more FAQs or another independent organization for additional definitions.)
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~ejw/authoring/ - 18k - Cached - Similar pages
    Here is another source code for earlier 404 Error Messages, barring surfers from going to my numerous pages held on Canadian servers.  Notice that it is somewhat different than the first.


<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>404 Page Not Found</title>
<style type="text/css">
<!--
body {
 margin: 0px;
 padding: 0px;
 font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
 font-color: #000000;
}
#wrapper {
 text-align: left;
 width: 580px;
 margin-top: 50px;
 margin-right: auto;
 margin-bottom: 0px;
 margin-left: auto;
}
.title{
 font-size: 20px;
 font-weight: bold;
}

.linktext { font-size: 12px
}
-->
</style>
</head>

<body>

<div id="wrapper"><p><img src="header.gif" width="580" height="70" /></p>
  <p class="title">404 Page Not Found</p>
  <p>Sorry! The page you requested is unavailable. Please use your browser's Back button, or go to the <a href="/" target="_self">home page</a>.</p>

  </div>

</body>
</html>

    It may be traced to the following who maintain that they maintain the Right to implement censorship against this document type:

World Wide Web Consortium - Web Standards
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) is an international consortium where Member
organizations, a full-time staff, and the public work together to develop ...
http://www.w3.org/ - 57k - Cached - Similar pages

128.30.52.166

OrgName:    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
OrgID:      MIT-2
Address:    Room W92-190
Address:    77 Massachusetts Avenue
City:       Cambridge
StateProv:  MA
PostalCode: 02139-4307
Country:    US

NetRange:   128.30.0.0 - 128.30.255.255
CIDR:       128.30.0.0/16
NetName:    MIT-NET
NetHandle:  NET-128-30-0-0-1
Parent:     NET-128-0-0-0-0
NetType:    Direct Assignment
NameServer: MINTAKA.LCS.MIT.EDU
NameServer: FEDEX.AI.MIT.EDU
NameServer: LAMPANG.LCS.MIT.EDU
NameServer: BEET-CHEX.AI.MIT.EDU
Comment:
RegDate:    1983-05-27
Updated:    2003-07-30

RTechHandle: ZM80-ARIN
RTechName:   MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
RTechPhone:  +1-617-253-8304
RTechEmail:  crs@lcs.mit.edu

OrgTechHandle: JIS-ARIN
OrgTechName:   Schiller, Jeffrey
OrgTechPhone:  +1-617-253-0161
OrgTechEmail:  jis@mit.edu

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2009-05-16 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.

About Me
Name: Jeffrey I. Schiller. Title: Network Manager Security Architect. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Welcome to my new homepage. ...
jis.mit.edu:8001/ - 9k - Cached - Similar pages

    UPON DISCOVERING THIS, I sent an e-mail to them, to Jeffrey Schiller's attention.  During the ensuing weeks which followed, though I received no e-mail reply, I was getting weird phone calls from a fellow named Jerry, who stressed to me his personal dissatisfaction with his life's direction, who also claimed he specialized in Internet security matters.  On occasion, the calls had an office background ambiance.
    I eventually assumed that it was Mr. Schiller evaluating me and perhaps engaging in mapping my voice.

    DON'T YOU THINK THAT IT IS REMARKABLE that you may not be able read what I have written here;  that in just a momentary instant, Hawaiian Telcom, under the Patriot Act, as they informed me on the telephone (by a fellow who works there named Mark), can make it impossible for you, myself or anyone else, to reach this URL?

    DON'T YOU THINK THAT IT IS REMARKABLE TOO that you may not be able read what I have written here;  that under the Patriot Act, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, can impose a 404 Error Message (Access Denied), making it impossible for you, myself or anyone else, to reach this URL?

    IN LIGHT OF THE FACT that my web site resides in Canada, and both the United States Constitution forbid censorship based upon one's faith, makes M.I.T.'s activities illegal and an F.B.I. or State Department matter.


Fundamental Freedoms
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: 

      (a)  freedom of conscience and religion; 
      (b)  freedom of thought, belief, opinion and 
expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; 
      (c)  freedom of peaceful assembly; and 
      (d)  freedom of association. 

    IS THIS NOT UNCONSTITUTIONAL for them to do this?

    AND WHY do they do it?

    ARE THEY SAYING THAT I HATE their god, and therefore this is a hate crime on my part?

    AND WHAT HAS THEIR GOD done to my wife?  And does he not enable their demons to prevent me from speaking of this horrendous and ongoing act, their god has committed?

    AND DOES CONGRESS find that someone such as myself is a threat to National Security, because of the Truths I know;  knowledge that can lead to unlimited energy?

    ANY WAY YOU SLICE OR DICE IT, it is just more intervention doing harm to me and my family, just the same way the Government of China controls their Internet, and those they feel are dissident.  This list must be endless, concerning the individuals of the entire Universe set upon by the collective, for what ever reason or purpose the collective imagines.

    AND WHO IS THE COLLECTIVE?  It should be obvious to all.  The collective or collectives are other than a mortal individual:  the ones in China, young children who grub for worms or anything they can eat along the railroad tracks, the children living in squalor underneath the streets of cities around the world, and the people like me who voice their opinion.

    THE COLLECTIVE is an individual group of wills, dead or alive, inertial or karmic, interconnected or not into a federation, with influence and power beyond that of the individual.

    MAST SADLY, the collective includes the people and nations of antiquity, star travelers, aliens, extra terrestrials or anything you may wish to call them.  It includes the consortium of gods:  from the ancients to the new gods everywhere.

    AND THUS IT SEEMS TO ME, that if god chose to intervene, as he did so, casting my wife into a closed chrysalis state, where she can neither speak nor move, all because he did not want people to know that he did not create the Universe, then should not those with the same capability do the same, to restore her back to the way she was?

    ONLY if the collective wishes to, and that appears not to be the case.

-Cosmo Joe