PREVIOUS ACTION      SUBSEQUENT ACTION

July 31, 2000                                                                         CERTIFIED MAIL

The Honorable Senator Tom Hayden
State Capitol, Room 2080
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Senator Hayden:

Over the course of several years, your Deputy, Ms. Sybil Trubin, has followed our family's plight. In her letter of April 27th, 1999, in so many words, she closes by saying that it may be too late for the State legislature to do anything for Mrs. Webb.

Actually, as it now stands, it is not to late. In fact, an urgent response by any of Buc's political representatives, sent to the responsible parties, principally the State agencies involved, may have a huge impact towards her recovery, by forcing relief by their failure to implement the law in a timely and meaningful fashion. As Buc's legal conservator, sworn to uphold her mental, emotional, physical and spiritual needs, I can tell you that she has always voted Democratic, as did her beloved Father, Louis Caputo, of Dunmore, Pennsylvania, thus to you Senator Hayden we write. Following is a brief outline of her disastrous skid down through our medical service system. One of the main culprits within this vermin invested arena, as former Insurance Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush might say as being, invisible to public scrutiny, is the Department of Corporations, to whom you have written several letters on Buc's behalf. We still thank you. Ms. Trubin knows about most of this, so you may wish to skip to the next paragraph in red.

HISTORICAL OUTLINE
Remember, the government was losing money on her since she was so young. Under the law, the State cannot recover patient funding until patients reach the age of fifty-five, and so during this interim, being that it is critical to their accounting department not to lose any money on her, it behooves them to deny aid which was being paid for with non-recoverable dollars, which is what they are clearly doing. Since I had not formally requested this prior, though I had inquired, the judge said that he could not rule. He further urged me to immediately make this an official request so that things can proceed. If it reoccurs, that I must again represent my wife at yet another rehearing, it will tear her farther away from the social and medical resources that I believe she is rightfully entitled, perhaps so much so, that she will lose all spirit; for she still yet believes that the doctors will come and make her well again.

I've done everything I can as Buc's caregiver, husband and conservator.

Just getting this far along under a multiplicity of duress by government agencies and inaction has been torturous. Throughout this ordeal, we have had no money and very little financial aid. Unable to meet the financial needs of a normal American family, two years ago the State Franchise Tax Board withdrew over one-thousand dollars from our account. After calling them, hysterically sobbing, they returned the money back. This was for Buc's 1966 payroll deductions which the government had acknowledgedly collected. They told me that because she had not turned in her tax return, they had no access to this money, so they felt obliged to steal it from our account, costing us well above and beyond that amount in the adding on of legal fees and other bank penalties. It is really disgusting how government and business pretend that they are friend to the family of man.

On this very day this happened, when a bank representative called me late in the afternoon, I happened to have spent the entire day trying to get through to the government in order to request more nursing. Just before the bank called, I waited twenty-five minutes for someone to pick up the phone. When they finally did answer, a very kind lady in one of the State agencies, apologized for not answering more promptly, stating that they are sorely understaffed. She also said that I had been given the wrong number! That's when Wells Fargo called to tell me that the State had absconded with what little money we had, leaving us with less than two hundred dollars! That's when I just put my head down and relentlessly sobbed.

At the same time, concerning parking violations, despite numerous letters to the DMV and LA and Santa Monica city attorneys informing them of our family's situation, they were ready to boot our car at any time in a tri city area. It was shameful, the government using its vast computer technology to hurt its citizens, when their computers should have been used to informed them about our family's desperate status. And we pay taxes for this! To finally get it cleared up, I paid over one-thousand dollars for two hundred dollars worth of fines.

I think that both Henry Waxman and Sheila Kuehl should know about this. All their lawmaking means nothing, if the laws are not pragmatically enforced by the government against itself.

Both the County and the State are sidestepping their obligation to one of their citizens. Equally bad, she is not much more than an abstract number to them, in the total disregard of her abject position. She cannot talk! She cannot move! She is alive! She can think! But, because under the less than watchful, nor caring eye of the Department of Corporations, who oversees HMOs, she was purposefully allowed to be caste down as irredeemable. And thus, she has and still remains...virtually abandoned. And I, as her caregiver, without rights, am virtually captive to what is no less than slavery and bondage, without respite, until I die, or until she recovers.

Where else is it not slavery to perform all the functions of citizens working without pay, without escape from these duties, night and day, under threat of great losses and perpetual fear, and endless exhaustion, performing what is otherwise the vested and delineated duties of their government's social service system? Does my love for this woman and my vow to God, accredit my servitude as voluntary and thus acceptable to our system of government? Really, where in the rule books does it say that the death of a spousal caregiver, as a result of both physical and mental exhaustion and breakdown, is legally permissible for any reason?

Quite to the contrary, in California's Code of Regulations, the exact opposite is posited, insisting that the Counties enforcing such laws should stimulate successful care giving by providing respite assistance to spousal caregivers, so that they don't burnout, or in my case, die. Something, which after four years, is yet to be offered or acknowledged. However, under State jurisdiction, this is not the case, as I remain in bonded servitude taking care of not so only my wife, but your citizen and your constituent.

Will I have to go before another judge for this? Really! What right does the law have to make our ordeal excruciatingly endless? Is it the untenable right shared by accountants and administrators to effectively and pragmatically alter our moral codes? There is something extremely wrong here to play these games, while all the time someone lies on their back waiting day after day, month after month, year after year. Will you really please help? Please call these people. Tell them to hurry. We need help!

God bless you,

Joel and Buc Webb
910-B 20th Street,
Santa Monica, CA 90403

For all government documents, actions, contacts and case histories, go to zyx.org.

This is a very popular science web site downloading one-quarter of a million files monthly. Follow the BUC link.
 
 

PREVIOUS ACTION      SUBSEQUENT ACTION