GENERAL
INDEX
ALPHABETICAL
INDEX
BUC'S
PLEA
KAUNAKAKAI,
OCTOBER 22, 2005
Thank you for coming to visit
me. It's been nine years now, since December 28, 1996, when I was
frozen in state. It is quite awful to be like this, and I know, I'm
just one more statistic in the world since all those earthquakes, tidal
waves and hurricanes.
My husband Joel, tells
me that there is ample evidence that, that what he calls OEAs (Off Earth
Aliens) are here in this star system in great numbers, just waiting to
help all of mankind, but that they
are put off by the warlike posturing of many of the world's most powerful
nations.
He says that anyone can
make contact with them if they want to; that they are far closer
and more numerous than even SETI imagines. Their principal base is
in orbit on the opposite side of our sun to us, their primary observation
position in direct line with our sun on this side and their primary insertion/instruction
base is behind the moon.
Had conditions been favorable,
they could have streamed down to earth in an armada of hospital ships and
saved hundreds of thousands of us from the Indian Ocean tsunami, typhoons,
hurricanes and earthquakes which have befallen so many.
If you were to study the
deflection patterns of intermediate meteorites, you would find an inordinately
inexplicable skew of those with urban vaporization
impact potential UVIP curves, something OEAs
can do for us without too much trouble. Maybe we should thank them.
If your interested in
lunar contact with OEAs, radio or laser should suffice, though limited
obviously to those with the essential technical skills to put a command
station together. Aim for the dark side of the moon. SETI
is already set up to do this, so you may want to collectively join and
contact them to emphasize this option, rather than longer range communication.
If you are interested
in optical daytime contact, might I suggest the equivalence of card stunts
at a college football game, where the fans hold different colored sheets
of cardboard in front of themselves or over their heads, turning them from
one side to the other in cadence, or in a programmed sequence. Anybody
can do this; a classroom of thirty children should be able to transmit
thousands of miles into the sky.
Select the type of code
you would like to transmit in; international code probably being
the best. You will need one person to call out the sequence in order
to keep everybody in sync.
This is how it works.
If everybody has the same colored card stock (30 cm x 30 cm) and sturdy
enough not to bend in the wind, and if they stand shoulder to shoulder
in a group holding the cards flat overhead, anyone at some great distance
away (above), will see a clump of white, if of course the cards are white.
If then on cadence or command, everyone turns their cards on edge, and
if everyone is wearing dark clothing, the clump of white will turn into
a clump of black or darkish. By repeating this in a specific sequence,
words can be spelled out, and sentences constructed, which can be seen
from very far away, far further than a flashlight at night.
I think that it is fair
to assume that the OEAs have pretty advanced optics, probably exceeding
by no less than one hundred times our present capability.
The technical capabilities of Keyhole camera images, the best we have,
are classified; however, analysis of public information reveals that
their resolution is about 10 cm at a distance of 300 km.
A classroom of thirty
five students standing nearly shoulder to shoulder on an open field during
lunchtime on a clear day, should make a target area of about six meters
square. By dividing the 10 cm standard for keyhole images into one
of these sides yields a sixty to one ratio. These means that OEAs
could resolve a classroom group at 18,000 km, or about 11,000 miles.
Under the assumption of having advance optics, the OEAs should be able
to see the students at a range of one hundred times this, or 1.8 million
km (1.1 million miles).
By filling a stadium with
people, OEAs could spot them from high above the earth, almost as far as
one half the distance to the sun. In any event, ten thousand meters
should do well enough, providing OEAs have observation satellites stationed
at this distance. These of course I expect would be positioned directly
in line with the sun at high noon so that they themselves are quite difficult
to be spotted by us.
I would greatly appreciate
it if someone might take this up. The objective of course, is to
make appropriate contact and then go from there.
This rather en mass approach
clarifies to OEAs who is actually contacting them, being on visual, and
I am sure is better than some sort of secret government controlled communication.
Return communication by
the OEAs is optional and under these circumstances favors simple walkie
talkie. Remember, they have plenty of power and radio telemetry skills
to beam down to anyone. We just have to tell them, when, where, frequency,
modulation mode and language.
I believe that you will
all be pleasantly surprised by the outcome, and recognize that diplomatic
recognition and communication coordination will be up for grabs, causing
considerable chaos, no matter who is the first to do it.
Culturally, we are not
at all ready for this, nor really prepared to take full advantage of the
results, yet we can only ask, if we don't do it, who will?
I myself are of reasonable
confidence that the OEAs can fix me, and would be willing to make myself
available to disembark, if everything was all right; implying that
the government of the United States cannot be involved because of is warlike
and dominating behavior, along with others. This is quite troubling,
because this usual option is denied.
If the OEAs make it clear
that they will only respond to people, unaffiliated, a generally global
response could happen, providing benefit to everyone everywhere, with limitation.
I have some ideas about this, but of course they are speciously beneficial
to myself.
My husband claims that
this is the problem. People will fight among themselves: some
claiming first right, others asserting authoritative power. The OEAs
probably would not like to go along without some assurances from us.
So who is going to represent the doves and the hawks? We should probably
expect their wishes that we make sweeping social, business and governmental
changes, against the wills of no doubt the wealthy, who will indubitably
attempt to buy their way in.
Sincerely,
Buc Webb